Sunday, January 12, 2025

Monks having fun



In the film "Name of the Rose" much was made of the attempt to deny monks  the gift of laughter. The Venerable Jorge goes to huge lengths to conceal Aristotle's Second Book of Poetics because it showed how humour could be used in teaching. Do we imagine monks laughing? Did they have fun? What did they do for recreation? The likely time for this was during Nones and Vespers in the afternoon.

St Benedict was most concerned about idleness. Therefore he laid down that monks should be kept occupied at certain times with manual labour and at fixed times with sacred reading. He disapproved of boisterous laughing and too much talking but there was no condemnation of an occasional chuckle...

Abbot Paul Delatte of the Solesmes Abbey in France explains this very well in his Commentary on the Rule in 1921.

“There is wisdom in avoiding the prudery which is shocked and scandalized by everything; when we are good, the peace and innocence of childhood, its moral naïveté, return to us. Still it remains true that there are certain subjects, a certain coarseness, a certain worldly tone, which should never enter our conversation. These things are not such as to stir wholesome laughter; there are matters which one should not touch, which it is wholesome to avoid. Our own delicacy of feeling and the thought of Our Lord will save us from all imprudence.”

 I guess St.Benedict appreciated moderation in behaviour and language and wanted monks to avoid coarseness. Monastic life was not  meant to be too severe. He knew that morale needed to be maintained. It was important for monks to keep strong and healthy in body as well as in mind. The best ways to do this could involve a country walk, a seat in a vineyard and a change of air in a country manor. Games were not forbidden in principle. Rather certain ones were prescribed.

At the great Benedictine abbey of Cluny, in the Middle Ages, there were two set times daily (except for Sundays and certain other days) when the brethren were allowed to talk in the cloister. The morning conversation did not go much beyond a half hour, and in the afternoon this period of recreational conversation lasted sometimes less than a quarter of an hour. Even the very austere Saint Bernard permitted his conferences given to the brethren in the chapter room to take on a recreational character, stopping from time to time to exchange lighthearted words with some of his monks, as a close study of the history of his life reveals.

Games certainly went on in some monasteries. At Durham novices had a bowling alley and the Novice Master acted as umpire. A kind of tennis occurred in some places. Restrained ball games were allowed at Festivals and particularly at the Feast of Fools on 1st  January. At the latter the least became the greatest and choir boys or deacons, for example took the service and games may have been played. It was chaotic but probably more in cathedrals than abbeys. I have not come across it at St Albans.  

There is some evidence of board games. Thanks to Janet Gough for the two photos below which I tracked down on X.

   Three Men's Morris game on stone bench at Gloucester
Cathedral

Game carved in a pew of St Mary's
Cistercian Abbey


At St Albans we have a similar game to Gloucester  Three Men's Morris. It is situated on a bench on the wall of  the North Presbytery Passage, very near the entrance to the shrine of St Alban. It is reckoned to be medieval. It was a popular game in the 13th century but was played in Roman times and thoughout the world in prehistoric times. It could have been used by pilgrims or by monks or both?





St Albans : the game is on the bench below the
double brass figures



 






There was a heavy shadow when I took this but I hope you
can make out the 9 circular slots which would
 have been used by the two players,

Dice and cards were used at Chester in the early 14th century for example. At St Augustine's Canterbury we find that chess, dice, use of bows and arrows, running with poles, throwing stones, being at cock fighting or taking part in outdoor hunts are prohibited. Involvement in hunting was apparently common in France with some abbeys having enclosures fir the trapping of deer.

 Music could be used to help the sick. It might be provided by hired entertainers. At Durham this was dine to celebrate St Cuthbert's day. e.g. in 1375.

 The regular blood letting was meant to be preserve better health , cooling unnatural instincts. it was likely regarded as recreational. It might mean overnight stay in the Infirmary or a spell of a few days at a nearby manor acting as a convalescent home. Discipline was relaxed there.St Albans monks went to the nearby Redbourne. siple. Rather certain ones were prescribed.

The warming room naturally acted as the regular place where conversation could occur usually at the end of the day. A fire was kept there from All Saints or 1 November to Good Friday.This developed in many places as the place for informal meetings, recreational conversation and minor celebrations. At Durham a cask of wine there must have brightened things considerably.

 Games certainly went on in some monasteries. At Durham novices had a bowling alley and he Novice Master acted as umpire. A kind of tennis occurred in some places. Restrained ball games were allowed at Festivals and at the Feast of Fools at Christmas. there is some evidence of board games.  Dice and cards were used at Chester in the early 14th century for example. The cloister at Gloucester has the template for Fox and Geese on a stone bench.  At St Augustine's Canterbury we find that chess, dice, use of bows and arrows, running with poles, throwing stones, being at cock fighting or taking part in outdoor hunts are prohibited. Involvement in hunting was apparently common in France with some abbeys having enclosures fir the trapping of deer.

 Music could be used to help the sick. It might be provided by hired entertainers. At Durham this was done to celebrate St Cuthbert's day. e.g. in 1375.

Carthusians broke their solitude with weekly socializing walks. Limited family visits Family were allowed : today this is twice a year.

Carthusians walking

 The regular blood letting commonly practiced in monastic houses was meant to  preserve better health , and cool unnatural instincts but  was likely regarded as recreational. It might mean an overnight stay in the Infirmary or a few days spell at a nearby manor acting as a convalescent home. Discipline would have been relaxed there. Likely late night drinking went on. St Albans monks went to the nearby Redbourn. Durham monks took turns for some time at nearby Finchale Priory. Cistercian monks might have as many as 9 sessions a year. Perhaps some monks feigned illness in order to have an extra blood letting sesssion. St Augustin’s Canterbury limited sessions to every 7 weeks.

Then of course monks might break the rules and get into mischief in their leisure time! I have not chosen to go into this at the moment. I shall reserve this for a later post called Monks misbehaving....


Selective sources

Bottomley, F. Abbey explorer’s guide (Otley, 1995)

Kerr, J. Life in the Medieval cloister (London, 2009)

Knowles, D. Religiou Orders in England vol 1-3 (Cambridge, 2008)

Parry, A. ed. Rule of St Benedict (Leominster, 1990)

Rosewell, R The Medieval monastery (Oxford, 2011)

Williams, D.H. The Cistercians in the early Middle Ages (1998)







Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Hospitality : How it worked at St Albans Abbey


This is a developing post. Here is my present take but I hope to revise it in the future.



Facilities for visitors in our Norman Abbey of St Albans soon developed due to Royal patronage, the need to accommodate pilgrims to the shrine of the  Proto Martyr, St.Alban, and as the first one day stopping point north of London. We also gained a good reputation for our hospitality and all this added to our popularity. The dilemma became : where should charity and hospitality part? More visitors led to increased financial burdens, administrative headaches, and noisy disruptions to the daily liturgy. Hospitality was a central part of Benedictine life at our Abbey. The ability to travel and be a guest here was dependent on social status. Those who were not freemen would have to seek permission from their lord to  make a visit. Travelling on foot was very slow and arduous. The more wealthy would travel by horse and might have servants. The reasons for visiting centred on pilgrimage. It might be as an act of contrition to make up for sins ; to give special thanks for a happy event ; to ask for healing of some ailment ; to appeal for help for someone or just to experience the sight of the great abbey and its shrine. 

Site of the Guest Houses and Abbot's Lodging

The Guest Houses

We believe provision for guests was made  by the Norman abbots with the rebuilding of the  Abbey. The interest shown by the Royal family  led Abbot Geoffrey de Gorham (1119-46) to build a large noble hall for the most important guests It had a double roof and a chamber for the Queen alongside. This was highly unusual. Possibly King Stephen and later King Henry II stayed in this Hall. The Queen’s Chamber could have been for Queen Adelaide or Queen Matilda. Later on other monasteries had quarters for a Queen. Ely had a notable example by 1250.

Abbot John de Hertford (1235-63) rebuilt Geoffrey’s Hall  on the same site, as it had become unfit for purpose. This rebuild has been described as a palace (palatium) with its two storeys, adjoining bedrooms, chapel,  fireplaces, chimneys, antechamber and vestibule. It had an undercroft and a lead roof  There were superb internal paintings by Brother Richard. The exact site and orientation of this 'palace' is not certain. On the painting it is shown west to east at 90 degrees to the other Guest House blocks. It may have been north south  and situated at the southern end of the these blocks. Insufficient excavation prevents a clear picture of its exact position. I will be looking at examples of other halls built at the same time to try to get a better idea of what it may have looked like. I know from having spoken to Joan Freeman that she based the monastic buildings in her painting (see above) on examples in other monasteries, and not solely on archaeological evidence - because there isn't enough!


Site of the Guest Houses

Abbot John de Hertford (1235-63) also built a new major Guest House for the nobler guests on the east side of the Great Court. Little is known about this major Guest House, usually referred to as the South Guest House. It is where most guests who arrived by horse would have slept and been fed. 

In the second half of the 14th century Thomas de la Mare had a North Guest House erected between the South Guest House and the south wall of the Church. It is not known whether there had been a building here before. This was presumably built to supplement the space offered in the South Guest House.

Interestingly Mayor Robert Shrimpton is said to remember (in the 16th century)"in the Abbey "there was a large Roome having Beds, set on either side for the receipt of Strangers and Pilgrims where they had Lodging and Diet for three days without question whence they came or whether they went, but after that time they stayed not without rendring an Account of both," 

Where this Roome was is unclear and its availability to all and sundry is also surprising.

The Abbot’s lodging was also used for receiving  important guests. It was Abbot Roger de Gorham who first built separate quarters attached to the southwest corner of the nave. It was renovated by Roger de Norton and John Moot and finally rebuilt by Thomas de la Mare.(1346-1396). John Moot (1396-1401) also built a necessarium (toilet)south of the lodging. I believe this was for the Abbot's lodging and there would have been separate toilets for the 'palatium' and Guest Houses described above.

The above summary is the conclusion from the incomplete 1889 archaeological evidence. In 1976 an aerial photo suggests the two Guest Houses in line at 90 degrees to the southwest end of the church as on the painting and another building set back which could be the rebuilt 'palatium'. The orientation of the latter is unclear.  During the Pandemic I often walked in the Orchard and several times stumbled over what seemed to be remains of the Guest House walls. Let's hope for another dig one day.

There was also a “Black Hostelry” for visiting Benedictines and a hospice for friars. The latter was built just before 1247. It surprises me because there was no mendicant  presence (Franciscan or Dominican) at St Albans and it seems that the Abbey made sure of this – perhaps by giving them hospice space? The Black Hostelry was in a three sided cloister with small garden built by Abbot William (1214-35). The exact location is unknown.

Site of the south side building on the Great Court

Abbot John de Hertford (1235-63) also built a long two storeyed stone building on the south side of the Great Court  opposite the earlier Great Gate which I suggest could have been used by the servants of the main guests or by the lay brothers of the Abbey or a limited number of the poor. There is  no archaeological evidence except for “some traces of old foundations” on Newcome’s sketch 1793 plan. It probably joined onto the Water Gate  and could have been on the site of the present Monastery Close.


Stables

These were along the west wall of the Great Court and according to Matthew Paris in 1252 could hold 300 horses.The Great Court must have been a very busy place! .

 Accommodation outside the Abbey

Guests seeking accommodation would have been received somewhere inside the Great Court, most probably by the Porter. and screened according to their requirements, status and what was available in the Abbey at that time. Pilgrims or persons on foot would likely not be accepted. The almonry situated by the Great Gateway might have  provided for some casual meals for those in need and might also have played a part in the reception of guests.  In some monasteries elsewhere  there was some provision every day for poorer people or pilgrims. This may have occurred here too  but most pilgrims were  referred to a nearby hostel or inns outside the precinct. The earliest of these may have offered free accommodation to pilgrims but it would likely have been in a hall sleeping together. The better inns would likely have required payment and I expect this got more expensive over the centuries up to the Dissolution. 

These hostels were  along the present George Street (then called Church Street) leading up to the Market Cross and later on developed down Holywell Hill, Some of these may have been founded by the Abbey or have financial links with them. We cannot prove that the Abbey actually caused any of them to be built. 

Abbot John's hostel today. Original front would include toilet block on left and The Bride shop

Abbot John de Hertford (1235-63)seems to have acquired a house on the corner of Spicer Street and George Street ffor use as  a guest house. It became known as the Tabard in 1545.Pilgrims may have been able to stay here free for a day and a night. It is the earliest recorded Inn in St Albans. Later it became known as the Antelope. 

The Tabard/Antelope

Unfortunately most of it was demolished in the 19th century. There is a rear view showing a gallery of 14th/15th century date. Some local residents will remember it in the late 20th century as a shop called  the Tabard. Today it is a Wedding shop. At the rear of the shop is a tiny yard with what appears to be the remains of a well. With vivid imagination it may be possible to think of the original layout of the yard ...see belo





Tabard/Antelope rear  today
Tabard/Antelope rear today

Remnant of well behind Tabard/Antelope?



The George today

At the top of George Street in 1446 the George (then called the George upon the Hupe) belonged to Sopwell Nunnery. It was leased to John Duke of Exeter for 6 shillings a year. In 1484  a licence was granted by the Abbot to allow Low Mass to be celebrated there for the “benefit of such great men and nobles and others as should be lodged at the inn”.








Thai Tavern (Tudor Tavern/ Swan)

The present Thai Tavern (which I remember fondly as the Tudor Tavern and known in the 15th century as the Swan)) also belonged to Sopwell Nunnery.in the 1440s. The oldest part overhanging the street dates from about 1400 and there is an original style window upstairs.






The original style window

The Lyon, next to the Market Cross also belonged to Sopwell in the 1440s and was rebuilt by Abbot Wolsey and Professor James Clark reckons it was used by Wolsey’s visitors as well as wealthy pilgrims and visitors. Another Inn called the Pecock  paid its rent in 1506 to St Julian’s Hospital (on the site of my church : St Battholomew!)see earlier post..

Finally the White Hart Hotel  was probably a guest house for the nearby Abbey. In 1535 it was known as the Hartshorn and was being leased by the Abbot of St Albans to John and Elizabeth Broke (or Brooke).

The White Hart today


The Abbey could not deal with all guests so it was logical that it would seek to facilitate pilgrims and travellers outside the precinct. Helping such facilities to start and develop could brought income. Sopwell seems to have discovered that and it is possible that the Abbey did not also do so.


Selective sources

Kerr, J. Monastic hospitality : the Benedictines in England c1070-c1250 (Woodbridge,2007)

Mortimer, I. The Time-traveller's guide to Medieval England. (London, 2009)

Niblett. R. and Thompson, I. Alban's buried towns : an assessment of St Albans archaeology up to AD 1600. (2005)
 
Shrimpton, J. ed. by C.I.A. Ritchie The antiquities of Verulam and St Albans. (St Albans, 1966)

Many thanks also to Judy Fingland of the St Albans Cathedral Guides and Jon Mein of St  Albans and Hertfordshire Architectural and Archaeological Society)


















Saturday, June 15, 2024

Hospitality - how it worked

 

Hospitality was for Benedictines and Cistercians a central part of their duty and service to God. This could be for the sick, the pilgrim, travelling nobility, the King, or fellow monks.. What had started as a simple duty  might increasingly require a development of their infrastructure : buildings, officials and support staff. How did this work?


The Welcome  -Benedictine

How to welcome  a guest was included in the Rule of St Benedict. It should be enthusiastic and cheerful. There were basic procedures which would vary according to the size of the convent , its community and accommodation, and the status and requirements of the guest. At the point of entry  a  porter or other official would say “Deo gratias” and the visitor might then be greeted by a superior, who would bow to him, and then  pray with him. Distinguished guests might be welcomed by the Abbot or Prior or even the whole community. In 1182 at Bury for Abbot Samson’s installation guests were met with singing, bells and sound of an organ. There would be an opportunity to find out the reason for the visit, whether the guest had horses and servants. whether they required dinner. The guest might then be led away for prayer and have a reading said to him. If the community were not reciting the Office he might be taken into the church for prayer. Otherwise prayer was said in the vestry. He might then receive foot washing in the cloister and be greeted by the Guest Master, who would lead him to the Guest House. Only the Guest Master was supposed to speak to the guest. Originally the Rule had recommended the foot washing (and hand washing too by the abbot) but as hospitality grew this became impractical, without disrupting the monastic offices and the running of the convent. The Guest Master had to ensure the guest chambers were kept ready, clean and that the tablecloths, napkins, bed clothes were sweet and clean. At Bury the split between guests for the Abbot or the convent became more accentuated. It became more than one person’s job here and at other larger convents. Disputes could arise over who was to stand in for the Abbot when he was away.

To get the atmosphere of a Guest House I recommend this post from the Abingdon Blog. It shows the interior of this surviving Guest House. 

West guest house, Fountains Abbey
(Matt Cormack CC BY-NC 2.0)
The Welcome - Cistercian

In Cistercian houses the porter was not a layman and this monk was excused his canonical duties to act as the welcomer. He would say “Benedictus” and find out the reason for the visit, and explain the expected rules of behaviour. The guest might receive the kiss of peace and be sprinkled with holy water and led to the Guest House where he would meet the Guest Master. The latter decided where he will sleep and be served. Also he might arrange foot washing. The Guest Houses at Fountains Abbey built in the 1160s were the furthest separate buildings from the Church and had fireplaces, latrines and rose windows. It seems that a tour of the whole convent was not given at Fountains (contrary to Benedictine practice) because Cistercians generally wanted to keep visitors away from the inmates. When the guest facilities were renovated in the 14th century a new two storey Guest Hall was built. Servants were housed in different quarters to their master. 

(Interior of guest wing, Fountains Abbey Damian
Entwistle CC BY-NC 2.0)

At Beaulieu the accounts from 1270 help to show how it worked ; nobles, ecclesiastics and distinguished guests were entertained in the Guest House; 'decent' travellers of lesser rank who came in the morning stayed only to eat, and those after lunch to stay the night. The porter could select up to 13 poor people to stay the night. At Christmas time as many poor people as there were monks ibn the convenr could stay from Christmas Eve until after dinner on Boxing Day. Apparently provision was made for feeding women relatives but we do not know where they ate. 

Some monasteries could not always hope to accommodate all demands for hospitality. The poorer visitors would stay in the local town or village, perhaps with friends or relations. They might use a hostel provided by the monastery which provided limited free accommodation or use an inn, if they could afford it. 

 Food -  Benedictine and Cistercian

Visitors to Cistercian houses were  limited to the normal Cistercian food with no meat until after 1335.In Benedictine houses distinguished guests would have had meat in the 13th century. As guests were graded and given varying accommodation, so too would the food and drink have varied. This applied to both Benedictine and Cistercian  establishments. Types of bread served differed according to status. Only distinguished guests dining with the Abbot would have wine. Herrings were the most common fish served to all. More exotic fish would be reserved for the Abbot’s guests. 

Problems

The cost of hospitality could be heavy. At Beaulieu during the year 1270 guests consumed 12,500 loaves of hospice bread and 7500 of better convent bread, along with 8640 gallons of good beer, 6000 of mixed beer, hundreds of thousands of herrings,1600 mackerel and 850 hake! Various methods of redress might be tried : for example, Cistercian houses sometimes received permission to not to receive guests for a limited period.

It was good practice to watch that guests did not “accidentally” take away convent property.  A Prior at Dover complained of strangers “who were such wasteful destroyers that it is impossible to keep things in order…such noxious…followers, that packed up tablecloths, napkins, sheets and coverpanes and such things as they could lay hold of”. King John stayed at Bury for 10 days with his retinue and  left 13 pence and a silk cloth he had purloined from the sacrist for which he had  forgotten to pay.

Behaviour of guests could be problematic and Lanfranc in his rules enjoined the Guest master to prevent the wearing of riding boots, spurs or just drawers (!) in the cloister. It was all about avoiding disruption to the quiet atmosphere and rhythm of the liturgy.


Some sources

Bond, J. Monastic landscapes (Stroud, 2004)

Bottomley, F. Abbey explorer’s guide (Otley, 1995)

Braun, H. English abbeys {London, 1971)

Clark, J.G. Benedictines in the Middle Ages (Woodridge, 2011)

Cook, G.H. English monasteries in the Middle Ages (London, 1961)

Crossley, F.H. The English abbey 3rd ed, (London,1949)

Greene, J.P. Medieval monasteries. (Leicester, 1992

Kerr, J. Monastic hospitality : the Benedictines in England c1070-c1250 (Woodbridge,2007)

Kerr, J. Life in the Medieval cloister (London, 2009)

Knowles, D. Religious Orders in England vol 1-3 (Cambridge, 2008)

Parry, A. ed. Rule of St Benedict (Leominster, 1990)

Rosewell, R The Medieval monastery (Oxford, 2011)

Williams, D.H. The Cistercians in the early Middle Ages (1998)


Sunday, January 28, 2024

Hospitality : an introduction


Model of Castle Acre Priory

 "All who arrive as guests are to be welcomed like Christ, for he is going to say 'I was a stranger and you welcomed me'" (Rule of St Benedict chapter 53). Hospitality was an essential part of Benedictine monastic life.Their practice was to become the foundation of  hospitality in the Middle Ages. In this post we will look at what this meant in principle  to both Benedictines and other orders and then explore in future posts the detail and how it worked, especially at St Albans.

There was a Benedictine duty to provide bed and board for travellers, pilgrims, war sufferers, relations of the inmates, fellow monastics  etc. Usually this was limited to two days bed and board, unless extended by the abbot or prior. Doors were closed to visitors after Compline. Demand varied according to the geographical position of the house and whether it was a pilgrimage site. Birkenhead Priory was by the ferry from Liverpool to the Wirral and always had guests. St Albans was unfortunate in being a day's journey from London and housing the shrine of  Alban, the Protomartyr. Think of it as the first Premier Inn north out of London. The stream of pilgrims must have affected the privacy and practice of monastic life here. Reputations travelled and some places gained a bad reputation : Crowland was one of these and the old rhyme said "Crowland, the courteous of their meat and drink, the beds are like stones, they break a man's bones". Smaller houses had limited accommodation while larger ones like St Albans and Bury had large blocks. Hospitality was always limited to men. Nunneries would be able to provide some accommodation for women. Provision for Royal female guests was rare. As we shall see Abbot Geoffrey (1119-46)built a special chamber for the Queen and her servants at St Albans. Otherwise women guests would have been referred to local inns which were outside the grounds of the abbey or priory. 

Cistercian houses were often in remote locations and this affected demands made upon them. The duty of hospitality does not seem to have been so strong initially and the houses were never open to all and sundry. There was no distinction between the abbot's guests and those of the convent, as in Benedictine houses.  . Later many houses developed large complexes of accommodation for guests. e.g. Fountains in Yorkshire developed two guest houses (the first from 1148) a good distance from the main cloister. Cistercians wanted to keep visitors well away from the monastic community. Both guest houses had two storeys with the upper floors as dormitories. Women were excluded but there may have been some sort of accommodation for them outside the Abbey gates. Fellow Cistercians from outside, on the other hand, were lodged in the main cloister with the Fountains community.   

In contrast to the  Benedictine idea of helping their spiritual passage by hospitality Carthusians thought salvation  came thorough contemplation and seclusion. Hospitality would be an incumbrance and their hospitality  appeared grudging. The mendicant orders (Franciscans, Dominicans)were more concerned with going out into the  community and when they no longer begged for their own accommodation and built convents these did not consider guest accommodation as important.

The differing types of guests and increasing demand began to require different kinds of  treatment. Larger houses like St Albans and Bury would get visits from the King and his retinue. Perhaps the larger monasteries were the only places fit for a King and his retinue. Reading and Westminster were popular for state meetings. Meetings likely occurred in the Chapter Houses. Visits by the King might require the whole place to be made available as far as possible. For example when Henry VI visited Bury at Christmas 1453 no less than 80 workmen had been involved several months in making it like palace for him. He stayed until Easter the next year!  Richard II held a Parliament at Gloucester, and was entertained at Tewkesbury and Gloucester in turn. Humphrey Duke of Gloucester was at S Albans Christmas 1423 for two weeks with some 300 followers. This must have been noisy, disruptive and possibly riotous with unseemly behaviour  by some of the retainers, apart from the expense.

Then there might be large numbers of pilgrims. Fellow visiting monks also made up quite a significant number. Therefore houses found they had to vet requests to visit. Patrons of an abbey were guaranteed a place.  Important visitors  would stay with the Abbot in or near his accommodation or a whole new block might be built as at St Albans. The famous waterworks plan of Christchurch Canterbury in the mid 12th century shows the prior's lodging to the northeast of the church where the important guests would go, the domus hospitum to the northwest of the cloister where cellarer and Guest Master would meet the middling  guests, and the aula nova in the northwest corner of the precinct where guests on foot would go.  Beaulieu had a system of grading guests at the gatehouse. When monasteries were full for the night they would refer guests to local hostels. These might have been built or bought by the Abbey. 

It is usually difficult to prove this but there are some good examples. There were several at Gloucester and the  New Inn there was built by John Twyning, a monk  for guests at St Peter's Priory (now Gloucester Cathedral). It is today the most complete medieval courtyard galleried inn in the country. We stayed the night there in July 2023. The  photos below show its size and complexity. Originally the two upper floors each had 20 chambers and the whole building could have accommodated about 200 guests. The large frontage was likely used for shops. Strangely the same is true today. Unfortunately it is a computer shop which seems slightly incongruous! The hotel has gone through difficult times lately and was up for sale. I hope it gets a good buyer and the fabric is looked after. It is a precious relic of the past.

 





The Angel and Royal at Grantham (see below)was a hostel originally built by the Knights Templar in 1203. The 14th century  gateway section still stands as the central facade of the Angel and Royal Hotel. It was not unusual for the funding of hostels at pilgrimage centres to be connected to  the local priory or abbey. In a later post we will be examining how this worked at St Albans. 


The Angel and Royal at Grantham

Abingdon Abbey owned a large number of properties in Oxford (25 in 1349) and some of these acted as inns. Glastonbury had the George and Pilgrims' Inn with its accomodation in a block facing the street. This was likely rebuilt in the time of Abbot John Selwood and Edward IV (1461-83). New tenants bought the lease from the Abbey in 1473 for £7/6/8  and an annual rent of 12d.

George and Pilgrims at Glastonbury



There could be benefits to hospitality. Guests were supposed to give an offering. Not all guests were generous and famously King John stayed at Bury for 10 days and gave only 13 pence and a silk cloth. Hospitality became an expensive business.. It could be a great way of getting sponsorship, acquiring land from a patron but patrons could demand favours. In 1279 Thetford had major financial problems when its patron, the brother of the Earl Marshal, stayed there with his retinue and its cost was in excess of all the resident monks.


Some sources

Bond, J. Monastic landscapes (Stroud, 2004)

Bottomley, F. Abbey explorer’s guide (Otley, 1995)

Braun, H. English abbeys {London, 1971)

Clark, J.G. Benedictines in the Middle Ages (Woodridge, 2011)

Cook, G.H. English monasteries in the Middle Ages (London, 1961)

Crossley, F.H. The English abbey 3rd ed, (London,1949)

Kerr, J. Life in the Medieval cloister (London, 2009)

Knowles, D. ReligiousOrders in England vol 1-3 (Cambridge, 2008)

Parry, A. ed. Rule of St Benedict (Leominster, 1990)

Rosewell, R The Medieval monastery (Oxford, 2011)

Williams, D.H. The Cistercians in the early Middle Ages (1998)























Friday, June 23, 2023

Monky Pensions

 Ever come across corrodies? It's a rather antique word that only surfaces sometimes in books about monasteries. Historians nowadays tend to give them a bad press. So what are corrodies about?

It 's when a monastic foundation agrees to provide stuff ( e.g.food, drink, accommodation, victuals, clothing,  ) to an individual ( the corrodian) 

-who has donated land, 

-or as a reward for work done for the monastery, 

-or for cash furnished by that individual, 

-or for one of the Royal employees by command of the King.

Therefore there are several types of corrody. The first ones involved landowners who decided to sign over parts of their land to the monastery in return for agreed provisions. This could be a good insurance in times of political unrest especially if you were getting old. This might mean regular food, beer, or accommodation in or near the monastery. The monastery should welcome this additional property as a good investment for the future.  So far so good for both sides. A monastery might want to reward a member of staff after years of service and therefore grant the person a corrody. This might mean a room in the monastic precinct or nearby, plus regular meals, drink and other benefits - i.e. like a retirement home. 

 In tough economic times monasteries began to  grant corrodies to individuals  for quick money.  However if they granted a corrody to someone who lived ten years this would be a drain on resources. There was risk involved. How much should a monastery charge for a corrody? The risks involved encouraged monasteries to live beyond their means. How could their infrastructure cope? Kitchens had to be stocked and extra meals provided. Shoes, clothing bought. Sounds like a supermarket. It must have become like a business rather than just a place to provide for its own trusty valued former servants.  This involved risk because there was no guarantee how long the individual might live and the agreement might also include his family. Short term gain to meet debts became long term burdens.See Corrody examples 1 and 2 for the kind of stuff that monasteries agreed to provide.

Then there monasteries where the King might demand a corrody for one of his old retainers. Kings believed that this was their right in monasteries which were Royal foundations.e.g.in 1325 a Royal huntsman maimed on a hunt in the New Forest was sent to Buckfast. Such Royal impositions might also include grooms or servants. see Corrody example 3.


Gatehouse of Thornton Abbey

A corrody was a deal between the monastery and the individual and the provisions and length did vary. Usually it was made in perpetuity. We can also think of it as a payment in lieu of money, although in some cases a monastic employee corrodian might get a mix of provisions and monetary allowance. Often it included a standard food allowance of daily bread and ale plus 2 dishes of cooked food a day and might also have pittances like cheese included in the deal. Sometimes monastic servants would already have had food and drink and other benefits as part of their "wages." 

 Accomodation must have been a problem. Perhaps the sick and infirm could go in a separate room in the Infirmary block. Perhaps the best examples of corrodians' rooms are at Cleeve Abbey in Somerset where there are two separate apartments on the ground floor below the magnificent new Refectory built by Abbot David Juyner (1435-87). Each of these apartments has its own living room, bedroom and latrine. Gatehouses were a possible location. eg Thornton Abbey in Lincolnshire. Sometimes corrodians died and left their wives and families and servants as a burden on monasteries. Maybe our gatehouse at St Albans was used for corrodians.

Corrodian's room at Cleeve Abbey
CC Licence Michael Garlick, 2015


The number of corrodians in the monasteries will have varied. To gain an idea  of scale  in 1322-3 Glastonbury had 60 monks and 19 corrodians (11 by purchase, 6 Royal and 2 former officials). Gloucester  granted 96 corrodies from 1280-1539.

Did the food and drink supplied to corrodians from the kitchens affect the amount given to the poor? It was usual for surplus food to be distributed regularly at he monastery gate. The provision of meals to corrodians likely meant that less was available for the poor. For example the practice of putting food out in the refectory for a deceased monk for a year and later distributing it to the poor, was perverted at Westminster by the selling off of this practice as a corrody.

All this may come as quite a shock seeing monasteries as providers  : servants calling in to collect food, clothing, firewood, beer agreed as part of the deal of their corrody. The management of these services must have become complex and burdensome. What may have seemed a good ides to deal with short term financial problems may have led to real longer term headaches.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Corrody example 1

A Corrody at Shrewsbury Abbey 1272 made to Adam of Bispham and wife  in perpetuity
2 loaves
3 gallons of ale of better sort
1 dish of food from abbot' s table, 2 when he was there!
their servant and maid to get 2 servants loaves, 2 gallons of lesser ale 
and one servant dish
Adam to get a robe each year
Wife to get 10 shillings for a gown
Servant's allowance for a horse
Use of a house for life
Allowances halved if one of them died.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Corrody example 2

A corrody at Worcester Priory 1308  made to Richard de la Lynde, clerk : services for money lent.
in perpetuity
A room in the priory
Straw and firewood as needed
6lb of candles of Paris tallow
20 shillings from the cellarer at Michaelmas
1 monk's loaf per day
2 gallons superior beer
Pottage as for a monk every day
1 dish of meat per day as for a monk:  raw or cooked as preferred 
Supper at the kitchen hatch as for 2 monks
A stable nearby with hay, and 6 horse shoes and nails
Attendant : 1  larger servant's loaf per day
1 gallon servant's beer

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corrody example 3

Corrody at Stratford 1317 sent by the King for John de Sutton, the King's cook 
A chamber in the monastery
Food
Clothing : 2 robes a year
2 grooms in attendance
2 horses
Candles
Firewood

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Some sources

Bottomley, F. Abbey explorer’s guide (Otley, 1995) 

Burton, J. Monastic and religious Orders in Britain, 100-1300 (Cambridge, 1994)

Cook, G.H. English monasteries in the Middle Ages (London, 1961)

Crossley, F.H. The English abbey 3rd ed, (London,1949)

Greene, J.P. Medieval monasteries (Leicester, 1992)

Harvey, B. Living and dying in England 110-1540 the monastic experience. (Oxford, 1993)

Kerr, J. Life in the Medieval cloister (London, 2009)

Williams, D.H. The Cistercians in the early Middle Ages (1998)



Monday, May 30, 2022

Leper Hospital in St Albans

 


My  writing on Monkybusiness has always tried to bring in our local experience in the great Abbey here in St Albans. When I do this the text goes into Italics. To conclude my series about Monks and Healthcare  I am focusing on leper hospitals in St Albans. There was one for men founded  between 1119-46 (St Julian's) and for women founded 1194 (St Mary de Pre). I shall mainly be concentrating on the former because it lay under the modern church of St Bartholomew where I have worshipped  over 40 years.

It came as a bit of a shock to me to know that as I practice the organ a community of monks may have chanted the Hours here 900 years ago and lepers may be buried very near. This year we are celebrating a mere 60  years !

We know that Abbot Geoffrey de Gorham of St Albans founded a hospital for lepers in the early 12th century beside the road to London (Watling Street) and the accommodation was on one side of the road with the church on the other. We can get an idea of what the church may have looked like from a contemporary one that survived at Stourbridge near Cambridge.(see below)



Leprosy was all around England at this time. Some saw it as a punishment from God or as a trial to be undergone. It could lead to terrible physical affliction with ulcerations, facial disfiguration, blindness and loss of fingers. It likely covered those with a range of skin complaints like eczema. Consequently such persons should be kept somewhere apart.

Hospices were being set up across England  staffed by monks governed by strict monastic rules, designed as a home with physical and spiritual help to those labelled as lepers. They were funded in a variety of ways. Here in St Albans Abbot Geoffrey arranged for the taxes (known as tithes) from various parishes which owed him allegiance, to be diverted to its support. These were confirmed and adapted by later abbots or Papal bull.

The initial 12th century rules have been lost so we have to deduce how the place was run from the Deeds of the Abbey and rules issued by the great 14th century abbots Michael de Mentmore and Thomas de la Mere. Lepers were forbidden to loiter on the road between the hospital buildings and the church. As St Julian’s Hospital was run like a monastery with resident monks, the normal eight offices (services) and Mass would have been celebrated daily starting very early morning. The lepers would have crossed the road to attend Mass and some of the offices, notably vespers and compline. They were forbidden to leave the monastery grounds without permission; to go into the town of St Albans ; to stay away at night or go into the brewery or bake house. There was a shelter facing the road along the side of the road where lepers could converse with one another, but were supposed to  be brief and avoid contact with outsiders. Visitors were allowed to visit a sick person.

St Barts Church today on the site of the church of St Julian's Hospital for lepers. The large road is        Watling Street which separated the hospital buildings from the hospital's church The photo is taken from the site of the hospital buildings ( later the farm)stood. The road would have been much narrower in the Middle Ages. 

They were to wear a special russet coloured tunic with sleeves extending to the hand, a super tunic right down to the ankles and sleeves covering elbows, and a cowl to cover the head. For church they had a black hooded cloak and big boots. All this was to ensure their afflicted parts were well covered. Food was likely monotonous. There would have been some meat , and  fish and 7 loaves of bread a week per person and plenty of beer. St Julians hospital had its own farm, granary, bakery and brewery. It was therefore as self-sufficient as possible, It is not known for sure whether any of the inmates played any part in this work, but what else would they have done all day?

In the mid 14th century there should have been 6 lepers and a community of 5 priests of good character and a master in charge. The strictness  of the rules suggest that in the past the behaviour of the inmates may have fallen below what was expected. By the 15th century the prevalence of leprosy had receded and our hospital had less inmates. Early in the 16th century, there were disputes about the mastership and  it may have ceased to function as a hospital. The domestic buildings and farm were then operated like any other belonging to St Albans Abbey.

After the Reformation and dissolution of the abbey in 1539 it passed to Sir Richard Lee of Sopwell, who obtained much of the former Abbey’s land. . Over the following centuries the hospital buildings were dismantled and rebuilt as St Julians farm, which stood where Tithe Barn Close and Robert Avenue are now. The church was no longer required and was demolished. This open space remained until our Church was built 60 years ago.




St Barts today : 60 years old!

Interior 


Exhibition in our Hall to celebrate 60 years


A nunnery was established by Abbot Warin in 1194 on a site between Watling Street and the river Ver   0.75 miles northwest of St Michael's church.  Nothing remains of it today but the Pre Hotel, which I presume may be near the original site. In 1352 there was a prioress and 8 nuns in the community there. As at St Julian's there would have been a small church with a series of domestic buildings. The prime focus  was on the care of female lepers.  


Tuesday, March 22, 2022

Healthcare by Monks

 We know that monks looked after their own health (see the last two posts) but how far did they help the sick in their local communities? Monasteries were expected to provide hospitality and help for pilgrims who became ill, but they did not cater for all the local sick. Yet did they provide some accommodation, perhaps for the privileged, or at least health advice? If we include the mendicant orders - the friars - the picture becomes more complex. We know that Augustinian canons often staffed the "hospitals" which were set up by wealthy patrons in our period just like monastic houses.  There were Infirmaries for the public in some cenobitic communities (notably the Cistercians) but there far more establishments of varying size, title and personnel which could loosely be called hospitals. Definitions and boundaries for these are tricky and provision will have varied from area to area and at different times. I hope that the following overview will shed some light on this fascinating area of study.

We know that Benedictine infirmaries were set up to meet the needs of their own monks In the Rule of St Benedict it is not clear whether there was a duty of care for the sick in general.  Herbal treatment and advice may have been given to local people but the idea of taking in the local sick to use the few valuable infirmary beds is mistaken. In later years wealthy clients may have paid for treatment in separate rooms but this will have been rare.  Provision for the outside sick had to involve separate buildings and separate funding. This begins to look like the modern concept of a hospital.

It might seem logical that hospitals were founded to care for the sick and the physical relief of suffering. Monasteries were more concerned to intercede for the souls of the living and the dead. We must understand that there was a crossover because illness was connected to divine punishment, and hospitals saw  a duty care of the soul as well as the body. In practice there was little if any  difference between a monastic infirmary and a hospital because the care provided likely began with washing the patient, providing clean warm bed with prayers and a round of offices (standard monastic services)performed each day around them.  The environment would appear to us like a church nave with beds and prayers and chanting going on.

Let's consider what  we actually mean by Hospital? The term may have first been used in 1112. Hospes (Latin) means guest or stranger.  The  way they could be founded, their purpose and mode of operation  varied. They can be divided into hospitals for lepers;  short term hospitals for the sick poor resembling hospices for the dying, or for pilgrims who were sick ; and longer term care for the elderly infirm or disabled. There is no agreement on the number of  hospitals from the late 11th century to the mid 16th century. It depends on how they are classified, but  there could have been as many as 1500.Perhaps half of them were directly connected to monasteries, priories or churches. Hospitals could be founded by anyone with money, whether King, Church, nobility, urban corporation, guild and it is not easy to detect who actually founded many of them. A noble might found one in the hope of spending less time in Purgatory. A monastery might choose to become  a patron of one  in order to boost its own reputation.

To give some idea of the spread of involvement by the various monastic orders it has been calculated that in 1146 there were at least 69 hospitals attached or close to a monastic complex.  (15 Benedictine, 2 Trinitarian, 2 Carthusian, 6 Cistercian, 6 Cluniac, 5 friaries, 4 Order of Holy Sepulchre, 24 canonries (Gilbertine, Augustinian, Premonstratensian),2 priory hospitals, 1 Order of St Thomas of Acon and 1 Order of St Lazarus of Jerusalem. These institutions were therefore staffed by a large variety of monks, friars  and nuns. 

Remains of St John's in Canterbury

How did it all start? Archbishop Lanfranc founded St John's Hospital in the 1080s for the infirm, with 30 beds for men and separate section for women. A separate leper hospital, St Nicholas Harbledown, was also founded nearby by Lanfranc  soon after. It is still known locally as the Leper Church. I recently visited this church - see  the photos below 




Other leper hospitals followed all over England built outside towns. 
We have an example of this in St Albans about which there will be a separate post.

The remains of the leper house at Stourbridge

There was a leper house at Stourbridge in Cambridgeshire  built about 1125 which was used by them until the late 13th century. Miraculously the chapel has survived - obviously with restoration but it is pretty much inside and out as the lepers would have known it. The largest Cistercian monasteries sometimes did have an entirely separate Infirmary  built to cater for the external sick.e,g, Rievaulx in Yorkshire, This seems bizarre to me because Cistercian sites were usually very isolated. The sick would have had to travel to them, and it was in the towns that care would have been more necessary. It is unclear how far treatment in these Cistercian lay hospitals went beyond  care and shelter and included real medical  interventions. There were medical men in monks and conversi but Gerald of Wales attacked some of these in the late 12 century for not having appropriate skills and therefore having bad results. From the account rolls at Beaulieu in 1270 we can deduce that inmates of the secular infirmary received daily broth from gruel, beer and small white loaf., meat, mainly mutton, with beans and peas, fish including herring, cod, hake, mackerel and this infirmary cost twice as much to run as the monks' infirmary. It was supported by bequests and donations.

 If they were offshoots of an abbey or priory the hospitals would invariably be situated outside the main monastery campus.  This was particularly true of Cistercian foundations. This was the case at  Fountains Abbey in Yorkshire and Zwettl in Austria.. The lay infirmary at Tintern Abbey in Monmouthshire was a mile away.  Zwettl in 1218 could cope with 30 needy infirm. Beaulieu in 1270 gave food and shelter at night for 16 poor men.

 Whereas the Rule of St Benedict tied Benedictine monks down to a specific closed place , the Mendicant Orders were different. Their role was more hands on with the local community. So far in these posts I have hardly mentioned these Orders so it is time to briefly explain what they were about. Their main trademarks were poverty, ability to travel around, and live in urban areas in order to preach, evangelise and help the poor. They are often called friars, not monks, and usually did not answer to an abbot nor necessarily stay in one location. The four great Mendicant Orders were the Franciscans (often called Grey friars and founded 1209), the Dominicans (often called Black friars  and founded 1215), the Augustinians (Austin friars founded in early 13th century) and Carmelites (White friars founded early 13th century). At first their houses were small but as they received donations, bequests, and sponsorship their buildings began to get larger and larger in towns. As for their attitude to public health it was their duty to visit the sick, especially the poor sick in their homes. Some Franciscans were physicians and treated their own members and some secular patients in the early 13th century and later on they may have acted as apothecaries.St Francis had conspicuously helped lepers as part of charity to the poor. Dominicans never considered physical care of the sick as part of their duty although there is some evidence that they treated secular patients in their infirmaries. How far the treatment in Mendicant infirmaries went beyond a clean warm bed and spiritual comfort is impossible to define.

Hospitals were founded to provide help for sick pilgrims or just accommodation for the night. The Maison Dieu at Ospringe, on the outskirts of Faversham, Kent, commissioned by King Henry III in 1234, was for travellers to the Continent to stay overnight, with chapel and food and bed for the night. The provision was both material and spiritual by Canons of the Order of the Holy Cross (or Crosiers founded in Belgium in 1210). The surviving building on the old A2  is only a small part of the original foundation. See plan below where it is to the bottom left and off the picture. The main buildings including the chapel and the Camera Regis where a King might stay are  on the other side of the road and have completely disappeared. A Master and 3 Augustinian brethren would have staffed the hospital (or hostel) providing spiritual and some physical care. Endowments by wealthy benefactors helped to support the work. However the demands of Kings and other nobles with large retinues meant that demands exceeded what was available, and along with incompetent stewardship of resources, the facility struggled during the later Middle Ages.









Maison Dieu at Ospringe Kent

Hospital buildings for the laity tended to follow the monastic pattern with the best drainage systems around and availability of water and toilets. Examples of these separate Major  Hospital buildings included St Mary Spital in London, St Leonard's at York and   Holy Trinity Soutra in Scotland. All three were run by Augustinian canons.  St Mary Spital was on the site of the present Spitalfields Market in central London. It grew to 180 beds staffed by 12 lay brothers or sisters. For  the interesting full story see  here.

Conjectural view of St Mary Spital 


Hospital of St Cross at Winchester

The hospital of St Cross at Winchester still survives  today. The design of these mimiced to a large extent a normal abbey.  with double quadrangle housing chapel and clergy in one and hospital in the other.

Hospitals seemed to have taken in both men and women and could be tended by men and women staff (monastic or lay) . St Mary Chichester gives a good impression of what a standard Infirmary would have looked like.  

Plan of St Mary Chichester

Interior view of St Mary Chichester 

To accommodate both men and women the layout would have required alteration. The Infirmary at St John the Baptist and St John the Evangelist at Sherbourne had a double decker arrangement with women on the top deck and  men below. The women would have still been  able to see Mass below without being seen from below. St Mary Spital in London may have been two storey too.

It appears that the number of hospitals declined later in the 14th century after  the Black Death. Many surviving hospitals were small, perhaps meant for 12 inmates,   and few had over 100 beds. Some cities had large numbers  : London 35, including 9 for lepers, York had 35, Bristol 16, Norwich 15, Exeter 10 and Canterbury 9.  but some of these were likely to have been like a hospice for 2 or 3 people.

What happened at the Dissolution of the monasteries? Perhaps half of the existng hospitals were closed following the King's audit in 1535 because they were run by monasteries or appeared to be like monasteries and fell into the category of having income of less than £200 a year. By 1540 the monasteries had disappeared through a piecemeal procedure of surrender and threat. Notably St Leonard's of York had also gone. More followed through the later 1540s as the King moved against collegiate churches and chantries. The great monastic and hospital foundations in and around the City of London emptied out and many became ruins by the reign of Queen Elizabeth.


                                                  Some sources

Ayliffe, W. St Bartholomew's Hospital and the origin of London Hospitals.  (2008)

Bottomley, F. Abbey explorer’s guide (Otley, 1995)

Braun, H. English abbeys {London, 1971)

Clark, J.G. Benedictines in the Middle Ages (Woodridge, 2011)

Clark, J.G. and Preest, D. eds. Deeds of the Abbots of St Albans (Boydell Press, 2019)

Crossley, F.H. The English abbey 3rd ed, (London,1949)

Evans, J. The Romanesque architecture of the Order of Cluny (Cambridge, 1938)

Furniss, D.A. The Monastic contribution to medieval medical care. Journal of Royal College of Practitioners,  15  1968, 244-250. 

Harvey, B. Living and dying in England 110-1540 the monastic experience. (Oxford, 1993)

Kerr, J. Life in the Medieval cloister (London, 2009)

Knowles, D. Religious Orders in England vol 1-3 (Cambridge, 2008)

Leroux-Dhuys, J-F.  Cistercian abbeys : history and architecture (Cologne, 1998)

McAleavey, T. Life in a Medieval abbey  (London, 1995)

Mahood, H. The liminality of care : caring for the sick and needy on the boundaries of monasteries. (University of Reading, 2015) 

Mountford, A. Health, sickness, medicine and the friars in the 13 th and 14th centuries. (Abingdon, 2004)

Parry, A. ed. Rule of St Benedict (Leominster, 1990)

Rosewell, R The Medieval monastery (Oxford, 2011)

Whittock Life in the Middle Ages (2009)

Williams, D.H. The Cistercians in the early Middle Ages (1998)